Dutch court says the government must do more to rein in noise pollution at Amsterdam's busy airport

FILE - KLM airplanes sit in Schiphol Airport near Amsterdam, Netherlands, on Jan. 18, 2018. The Dutch government has systematically put the interests of the aviation sector above those of people who live near Schiphol Airport, one of Europe's busiest aviation hubs, a Dutch court ruled Wednesday, saying that the treatment of local residents amounts to a breach of Europe's human rights convention. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong, File)

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) 鈥 The Dutch government has systematically put the interests of the aviation sector above those of people who live near Schiphol Airport, one of Europe's busiest aviation hubs, a Dutch court ruled Wednesday, saying that the treatment of local residents amounts to a breach of Europe's human rights convention.

鈥淭he state has always prioritized the 鈥榟ub function鈥 and the growth of Schiphol,鈥 The Hague District Court said, as it ordered authorities to do more to rein in noise pollution.

The court ruling was the latest development in long-running efforts to rein in noise pollution and nuisance caused by the airport on the outskirts of Amsterdam. Late last year, the government following protests from countries including the United States and warnings that the move could breach European law and aviation agreements.

鈥淭he judge鈥檚 decision is crystal clear: more attention must be paid to local residents and the reduction of noise pollution. That was already the government鈥檚 commitment, and we will study the verdict,鈥 the ministry for infrastructure and water said in a written response.

The national public health institute estimates that around 259,000 people in the Netherlands experience 鈥渟erious nuisance鈥 from aircraft flying over the densely populated country.

Wednesday's court ruling ordered the government to properly enforce existing noise pollution laws and regulations within a year and to provide 鈥減ractical and effective legal protection for all people who experience serious inconvenience or sleep disturbance due to air traffic to and from Schiphol.鈥

The organization that brought the case, called The Right to Protection from Aircraft Nuisance, welcomed the ruling.

鈥淭he court ruled that the state did not properly weigh interests: economic interests have always been central, local residents were lowest in the pecking order. That is no longer allowed,鈥 it said, adding that the group and its lawyers were 鈥渆xtremely satisfied鈥 with the decision.

Schiphol said in a statement that it is working toward reducing noise pollution

鈥淟ike these local residents, we want aviation to cause less nuisance. At the same time, we want the Netherlands to remain connected to the rest of the world, but quieter, cleaner and better,鈥 the airport said in a written statement.

Among measures the airport is proposing are closing at nighttime and banning the noisiest planes.

鈥淭his will lead to a reduction in the number of people experiencing noise nuisance. In the short term, it is in any case important to have legislation that gives clarity to both local residents and the aviation sector. That is also the judge鈥檚 verdict today,鈥 Schiphol added.

The 春色直播 Press. All rights reserved.

More Health Stories

Sign Up to Newsletters

Get the latest from 春色直播News in your inbox. Select the emails you're interested in below.