ATLANTA (AP) 鈥 They were led down a staircase into a garage beneath a downtown Atlanta courthouse, where officers with big guns were waiting. From there, they were ushered into vans with heavily tinted windows and driven to their cars under police escort.

For Emily Kohrs, these were the moments last May when she realized she wasn鈥檛 participating in just any .

鈥淭hat was the first indication that this was a big freaking deal,鈥 Kohrs told The Associated Press.

The 30-year-old Fulton County resident who was between jobs suddenly found herself at the center of one of the nation鈥檚 most significant legal proceedings. She would become foreperson of the special grand jury selected to investigate whether then-President and his Republican associates illegally meddled in Georgia鈥檚 2020 presidential election. The case has emerged as one of Trump鈥檚 as he mounts a third presidential campaign, in part because asking state election officials to for him.

For the next eight months, Kohrs and her fellow jurors would hear testimony from 75 witnesses, ranging from some of Trump鈥檚 most prominent allies to local election workers. released last Thursday said jurors believed that 鈥渙ne or more witnesses鈥 committed perjury and urged local prosecutors to bring charges. The report鈥檚 recommendations for charges on other issues, including potential attempts to influence the election, remain secret for now.

The AP identified Kohrs after her name was included on subpoenas obtained through open records requests. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney advised Kohrs and other jurors on what they could and could not share publicly, including in interviews with the news media.

During a lengthy recent interview, Kohrs complied with the judge鈥檚 instructions not to discuss details related to the jury鈥檚 deliberations. She also declined to talk about unpublished portions of the panel鈥檚 final report.

But her general characterizations provided unusual insight into a process that is typically cloaked in secrecy.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who was on the receiving end of , was 鈥渁 really geeky kind of funny,鈥 she said. State House Speaker David Ralston, who died in November, was hilarious and had the room in stitches. And Gov. , who succeeded in delaying his appearance until after his reelection in November, seemed unhappy to be there.

Kohrs was fascinated by an explainer on Georgia鈥檚 voting machines offered by a former Dominion Voting Systems executive. She also enjoyed learning about the inner workings of the White House from Cassidy Hutchinson, who Kohrs said was much more forthcoming than her old boss, former White House chief of staff .

Kohrs sketched witnesses in her notebook as they spoke and was tickled when Bobby Christine, the former U.S. attorney for Georgia鈥檚 Southern District, complimented her 鈥渞emarkable talent.鈥 When the jurors鈥 notes were taken for shredding after their work was done, she managed to salvage two sketches 鈥 U.S. Sen. and Marc Short, who served as chief of staff to former Vice President 鈥 because there were no notes on those pages.

After Graham tried so hard to avoid testifying 鈥 taking his fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court 鈥 Kohrs was surprised when he politely answered questions and even joked with jurors.

Former New York mayor and Trump attorney was funny and invoked privilege to avoid answering many questions but 鈥済enuinely seemed to consider鈥 whether it was merited before declining to answer, she said.

When witnesses refused to answer almost every question, the lawyers would engage in what Kohrs came to think of as 鈥渟how and tell.鈥 The lawyers would show video of the person appearing on television or testifying before the U.S. House committee that investigated , periodically asking the witness to confirm certain things. Then the scratching of pens on paper could be heard as jurors tallied how many times the person invoked the Fifth Amendment.

At least one person who resisted answering questions became much more cooperative when prosecutors offered him immunity in front of the jurors, Kohrs said. Other witnesses came in with immunity deals already in place.

Trump鈥檚 attorneys have said he was never asked to testify. Kohrs said the grand jury wanted to hear from the former president but didn鈥檛 have any real expectation that he would offer meaningful testimony.

鈥淭rump was not a battle we picked to fight,鈥 she said.

Kohrs didn鈥檛 vote in 2020 and was only vaguely aware of controversy swirling in the wake of the election. She didn鈥檛 know the specifics of or his efforts to reverse his loss. When prosecutors played the then-president鈥檚 phone call with Raffensperger on the first day the jurors met to consider evidence, it was the first time Kohrs had heard it.

鈥淚 just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have," Trump said on the call.

Though Kohrs said she tends to agree more with Democrats, Kohrs said she doesn鈥檛 identify with any political party and prefers to listen to all opinions.

鈥淚f I chose a political party, it would be the not-crazy party,鈥 she said.

Kohrs called herself a 鈥済eek about the justice system鈥 and noted the challenges some jurors faced balancing their responsibilities on the panel with outside duties. When she eagerly volunteered to be foreperson, she met no resistance from her fellow jurors, who were less enthusiastic about the time-consuming obligation stretching before them, she said.

One of her first duties as foreperson was to sign a big stack of subpoenas.

As the proceedings played out, one of her fellow jurors brought the newspaper every day and pointed out stories about the investigation. Prosecutors, Kohrs said, told jurors they could consume news coverage related to the case but urged them to keep an open mind.

Kohrs said she mostly avoided stories related to the proceedings to avoid forming an opinion.

鈥淚 didn鈥檛 want to characterize anyone before they walked in the room,鈥 she said. 鈥淚 felt they all deserved an impartial listener.鈥

Of the 26 people on the panel 鈥 23 jurors and three alternates 鈥 16 had to be present for a quorum. There was a core group of between 12 and 16 who showed up almost every day they were in session, Kohrs said, and she could recall only one day when they couldn鈥檛 proceed because not enough seats were filled. The most they ever had in the room was 22 鈥 on the day Giuliani testified.

As the months passed, the grand jurors grew more comfortable with each other and with the four lawyers on Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis鈥 team who led the proceedings. But they鈥檙e not all best friends now that it鈥檚 over.

鈥淲e are not meeting up now. We don鈥檛 have a group chat,鈥 Kohrs said.

While the jurors asked to hear from certain witnesses, most witnesses were decided upon by the district attorney鈥檚 office. But Kohrs said she didn鈥檛 feel as though prosecutors were trying to influence the jurors鈥 final report.

鈥淚 fully stand by our report as our decision and our conclusion,鈥 she said.

___

Follow the AP's coverage of investigations related to former President Donald Trump at .

The 春色直播 Press. All rights reserved.